Module 001 - CANONICAL_FOUNDATION

Decision Defensibility Framework

Define the Raven meaning of a defensible operational decision.

Purpose

Define the Raven meaning of a defensible operational decision.

Evidence
Unknowns
Alternatives
Authority
Replay
Outcome

Core Outputs

Specification Summary

SectionContent
DefinitionA decision is defensible when the organization can later show what was known, what was unknown, which alternatives were available, who had authority, why the selected path was reasonable and what outcome was later observed. Raven treats defensibility as an evidence object, not as a verbal explanation after the fact. The framework is read-only by default. It does not create production actions, customer communications, payments, invoices or live automation without explicit human approval.
LifecycleWeak signal intake -> evidence classification -> unknown register -> alternative preservation -> consequence framing -> authority check -> human approval -> replay -> outcome measurement -> decision memory. The lifecycle preserves rejected alternatives because enterprise review often asks why a path was not taken. Replay must reconstruct the state of knowledge at the decision time, not only the final incident narrative.
Decision ProofDecision proof requires timestamped evidence, source lineage, confidence rationale, uncertainty, authority and the final human-approved decision. Financial consequence is separated from operational consequence. Mira handles concrete cost and package language; Raven handles operational reasoning. A valid proof object can still conclude UNKNOWN or HUMAN_REVIEW_REQUIRED.

QA Gates

Canonical Artifacts

Internal artifacts for this module are retained in the private Raven research workspace. Public pages expose only the public-safe summary and stable module identifier 001.