Raven Public Research Report
Operational Consequences (Technical)
How business criticality changes the value of a technical decision. This technical version exposes the evidence mechanics, replay boundary and test lineage.
What this report shows
Gold path
Gold-class reasoning ties operational symptoms to business criticality and human authority.
Low volume, high impact
SCN-007 is retained as an engineering lesson: low frequency does not imply low consequence.
SLA boundary
The report marks customer-specific SLA and financial claims as pilot-required unless a client dataset validates them.
Technical boundary
The technical version preserves source identifiers, test families and limitations without exposing private implementation paths.
Engineers should treat the numbers as internally reproducible counts from local artifacts, not as external validation.
Required customer validation
A customer pilot must provide incident history, topology context, ticket or dispatch evidence, decision timestamps and a mutually accepted ground-truth method.
Raven should prefer UNKNOWN or HUMAN_REVIEW_REQUIRED when those inputs are missing or contradictory.