Decision governance
Governance Overview
Raven's category is strongest when responsibility stays visible. The system should help the organization defend a decision, not hide authority behind automation.
Core human authority
Output defensible decision
Boundary no automatic blame
Roles
RavenPrepares evidence-bound operational decision packets: problem, evidence, options, recommendation, confidence and unknowns.
MiraFrames cost exposure, budget impact, package depth and commercial constraints.
Decision ruleRaven recommends. Mira frames cost. The human approves. This rule remains visible before pilot, during runtime and inside reports.
Human ownerApproves, rejects, asks for more evidence or escalates. Human authority remains final.
Admin Review QueueShows pending gates by severity, tenant, required approver role and next action before provider, data, deploy, restore, send, pricing, security or activation release.
OrganizationDefines role authority, approval chain, retention, support boundary and acceptable risk.
Defensible Decision
EvidenceThe organization can see what supported the recommendation.
UnknownsThe organization can see what Raven did not know and should not pretend to know.
Approval chainThe organization can see who accepted responsibility for action.
Queue boundaryQueue visibility is read-only until a separate approved workflow performs assignment, approval, notification or production action.
Audit trailThe organization can preserve the evidence, assumptions, recommendation, approval and outcome for review.
Report intelligenceApproved reports can improve future recommendations through same-customer memory and, at higher packages, anonymized pattern classes. The source lane and limits must remain visible.
Platinum depthIn higher-depth reviews, the decision should be easier to defend because alternatives, assumptions and cost exposure are more explicit.
Post-event reviewThe organization can compare recommendation, action and outcome after the incident.